InjuryAllies

California Car Accident Law

California Auto Insurance Minimum Limits Just Changed — What Injury Victims Need to Know

For the first time since 1967, California raised the minimum amount of liability insurance every driver must carry. If you were hurt in a Los Angeles crash, the change quietly rewrote the math on what your claim is worth.

Published August 6, 2026 · Reviewed by the InjuryAllies legal team · 9 min read

What actually changed on January 1, 2025

California's Financial Responsibility Law requires every driver to prove they can pay for the harm they cause. For most people that means buying liability insurance. From 1967 until the end of 2024, the state's required minimum was 15/30/5: $15,000 for bodily injury or death to one person, $30,000 total for injury or death to more than one person in the same crash, and $5,000 for property damage.

Senate Bill 1107 — the Protect California Drivers Act — changed that. Effective January 1, 2025, the statutory minimum became 30/60/15:

CoverageOld minimum (1967–2024)New minimum (2025–2034)Scheduled (2035+)
Bodily injury — one person$15,000$30,000$50,000
Bodily injury — total per accident$30,000$60,000$100,000
Property damage$5,000$15,000$25,000

The increase applies to policies issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025. Because most personal auto policies run in six- or twelve-month terms, essentially every California driver who kept insurance rolled onto the new floor sometime during 2025. Uninsured motorist coverage limits offered by insurers were adjusted in parallel, and the same 30/60/15 floor now governs the alternative forms of financial responsibility — cash deposits and self-insurance certificates filed with the DMV.

The short version

  • Minimum bodily injury coverage doubled from $15,000 to $30,000 per person.
  • Minimum property damage coverage tripled from $5,000 to $15,000.
  • The change applies to policies issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.
  • The limits that matter to your claim are the limits in force on the date of the crash.
  • A second increase to 50/100/25 is already written into law for January 1, 2035.

Why California finally raised the limits

The old numbers were set when a new car cost about $2,700 and a night in a hospital cost less than a tank of gas today. Fifty-seven years of medical inflation turned $15,000 into a figure that frequently did not cover a single ambulance ride and one CT scan at a Los Angeles trauma center. It was common for an injured person with a broken wrist and a few months of physical therapy to exhaust the at-fault driver's entire policy before the first surgical consult.

The $5,000 property damage minimum had aged even worse. With the average transaction price of a new vehicle well above $45,000, a moderate rear-end collision on the 405 routinely produced repair estimates several times the legal minimum — leaving innocent drivers to absorb the difference through their own collision coverage and deductible, or out of pocket.

By the time the Legislature acted, California was tied for the lowest bodily injury minimums in the country. The 2025 increase moved the state closer to the national middle, and the built-in 2035 step-up was designed so the limits would not sit frozen for another half century.

How the new limits change your injury claim

Insurance minimums are not a measure of what your injuries are worth. They are a ceiling on what one particular policy will pay. But that ceiling shapes almost everything about how a claim is negotiated.

1. More claims now settle without a coverage fight

A large share of Los Angeles collision claims involve soft-tissue injuries, a course of chiropractic or physical therapy, imaging, and a period of missed work — a realistic value somewhere between $15,000 and $40,000. Under the old floor, those cases slammed into a $15,000 wall almost immediately. Under 30/60/15, a meaningful percentage of those same claims now fit inside the at-fault driver's policy, which means faster resolution and less pressure to accept a discounted "policy limits" offer.

2. Multi-victim crashes have more room

The per-accident figure matters enormously in a city where cars are full. Under the old $30,000 aggregate, a single crash injuring a driver and three passengers left an average of $7,500 per person before anyone's medical bills were paid. The $60,000 aggregate doubles that pool. It is still thin for a serious multi-victim collision, but it changes how those claims are divided and how quickly an insurer is forced to interplead the funds.

3. Property damage claims are far less likely to blow out

Tripling the property damage minimum to $15,000 means a totaled mid-range vehicle is now more often covered by the at-fault driver's policy rather than by your own collision coverage. That saves you a deductible and, in many cases, spares you a subrogation fight between insurers that can hold up your rental car reimbursement.

4. Bad-faith exposure shifts

When a claim is clearly worth more than the available policy, a properly presented policy-limits demand puts the insurer under an obligation to settle within limits or expose its own insured to an excess judgment. Higher minimums move the threshold at which that dynamic kicks in. Practically, it means the timing and precision of your demand package matter more than ever — an under-documented demand sent too early can waste the leverage the new limits created.

Not sure how much coverage is available for your crash?

Finding every applicable policy — the driver's, the vehicle owner's, an employer's, an umbrella, your own UM/UIM — is one of the most valuable things a lawyer does in the first two weeks. We do it at no cost to you, and you pay nothing unless we recover.

Call (323) 372-1216 — Free Consultation

Which limits apply to your crash?

This is where people get tripped up. The new minimum is not retroactive. The coverage that governs your claim is the coverage that was in force on the date of the collision.

Never assume the at-fault driver only carries the minimum. Many people buy 100/300 or higher without thinking about it, and the declarations page is only obtainable through a claim, a demand, or formal discovery. The single most common mistake we see is a claimant accepting a "that's all there is" statement over the phone without ever seeing proof.

The UM/UIM problem most LA drivers don't see coming

Uninsured motorist (UM) and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage sits on your own policy and pays when the at-fault driver has no insurance or not enough of it. In California, insurers must offer it; you can only reject it in writing. Many people did reject it, years ago, on a phone call they no longer remember.

Here is the part that catches people. California UIM coverage is offset, not additive. If you carry $50,000 in UIM and the at-fault driver pays their $30,000 limit, your UIM pays the difference — $20,000 — not another full $50,000. That means when the state raised the liability floor to $30,000, every UIM policy in California effectively lost value at the bottom end. A driver carrying $30,000 in UIM now has, in practical terms, zero underinsured protection against a minimum-limits driver, because the offset consumes the entire coverage.

If your UM/UIM limits are equal to the new state minimum, your underinsured coverage does nothing against a minimum-limits driver. Raising UM/UIM well above 30/60 is the single cheapest fix available to a California driver.

Note the distinction: uninsured motorist coverage (driver had no policy at all, or a hit-and-run) is not subject to that offset and still pays its full limit. It is specifically the underinsured layer that gets squeezed. If you take one action item from this article, make it a call to your own agent about raising UM/UIM limits — the premium difference is usually a few dollars a month.

When 30/60/15 still isn't enough

Doubling the minimum does not make it adequate. A single night in an ICU at a Los Angeles trauma center, a surgical repair of a fractured tibia, or a lumbar fusion will each exceed $30,000 on their own — before lost income, future care, or pain and suffering. When the policy runs out, a thorough attorney looks for additional sources:

A minimum-limits case handled well and a minimum-limits case handled poorly can differ by an order of magnitude, entirely because of which of these layers got found.

Los Angeles-specific realities

Statewide rules land differently in Los Angeles County, which has more registered vehicles than most states.

Uninsured drivers are not a rare event here

Southern California consistently posts one of the highest uninsured-motorist rates in the nation — estimates commonly land near or above one in five drivers in parts of LA County. The 2025 increase does nothing for a claimant hit by someone who never bought a policy at all. In fact, one predictable side effect of a higher mandatory minimum is a modest premium increase at the low end of the market, which some advocates warned could push marginal drivers out of coverage entirely. That risk is precisely why UM coverage on your own policy matters so much in this city.

Where LA crashes cluster

The corridors that generate the most serious injury claims in our practice are familiar to anyone who drives here: the I-405 through the Sepulveda Pass, the I-10 between downtown and Santa Monica, the 101 through Hollywood and the Valley, surface arterials like Vermont, Figueroa, Sepulveda, and Ventura Boulevard, and the notoriously dangerous stretches of Olympic and Venice. High-speed freeway impacts and multi-vehicle chain collisions are exactly the scenarios where a $60,000 per-accident aggregate gets divided among four or five injured people.

California Low Cost Auto (CLCA)

The state's low-income program continues to offer coverage below the standard minimum under a statutory exemption. If you are hit by a CLCA-insured driver, the available liability limits are substantially lower than 30/60/15. Confirming which program applies early changes your entire strategy.

Comparative fault

California is a pure comparative negligence state. Even if you were partly at fault, you can recover — your award is simply reduced by your percentage of responsibility. Insurers in Los Angeles are aggressive about assigning claimants a share of fault, particularly in lane-change, left-turn, and pedestrian cases. Documenting the scene, preserving dashcam footage, and identifying independent witnesses within the first days is what keeps that percentage low.

Claims against public entities

If a City of LA vehicle, an LA Metro bus, a county vehicle, or a dangerous public roadway is involved, the Government Claims Act imposes a six-month written claim deadline. That is not a typo and there is very little forgiveness for missing it.

What to do after a crash in Los Angeles

  1. Get medical attention the same day. Gaps in treatment are the first thing an adjuster uses to discount a claim, and adrenaline routinely masks soft-tissue and head injuries for 24 to 72 hours.
  2. Report it. Call police or file an SR-1 with the DMV within 10 days if there is injury, death, or property damage over $1,000.
  3. Photograph everything — all vehicles, all angles, the roadway, signals, skid marks, and your visible injuries. Photos taken at the scene are worth more than any argument made later.
  4. Get the other driver's declarations page, not just a policy number. You are entitled to know the limits.
  5. Notify your own insurer and open a UM/UIM claim as a precaution. Most UM/UIM policies contain notice and consent-to-settle conditions; settling with the at-fault carrier without your own insurer's written consent can forfeit your UIM claim entirely.
  6. Do not give a recorded statement to the other driver's insurer before you have spoken with a lawyer.
  7. Watch the clock. Two years for most injury claims; six months for government claims; shorter contractual deadlines may apply to UM/UIM arbitration demands.

If your crash also involved a hazardous property condition — a parking structure, a poorly maintained lot, an obstructed sidewalk — the analysis overlaps with a premises claim. Our guides to car accident claims in Los Angeles and slip and fall cases in Los Angeles cover those tracks in detail.

The next increase: 50/100/25 in 2035

SB 1107 did not stop at 2025. The statute schedules a second increase effective January 1, 2035, raising the minimums to $50,000 per person, $100,000 per accident, and $25,000 for property damage. Anyone insured in California should expect a further premium adjustment at the low end when that arrives — and anyone injured after that date will be negotiating against a materially larger floor.

The practical takeaway for today: minimum limits are a moving target, and the limits that matter are the ones that existed on the day you were hurt. Determining them accurately is step one of every competent claim evaluation.

Frequently asked questions

What are California's new minimum auto insurance limits?

As of January 1, 2025, California requires at least $30,000 for injury or death to one person, $60,000 for injury or death to more than one person, and $15,000 for property damage — written as 30/60/15. The prior minimum, unchanged since 1967, was 15/30/5.

Does the new 30/60/15 minimum apply to an accident that happened before 2025?

No. The coverage that applies is the coverage in force on the date of the crash. If your collision happened before January 1, 2025, the at-fault driver's policy may still carry the old 15/30/5 minimum. The new limits attach to policies issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025.

What happens if my injuries are worth more than the at-fault driver's policy limits?

You may recover the difference through your own underinsured motorist coverage, from additional defendants such as an employer or vehicle owner, from an umbrella policy, or by pursuing the at-fault driver's assets. An experienced Los Angeles injury attorney will identify every available layer of coverage before you settle — because once you sign a release, that door closes.

Should I raise my own uninsured motorist coverage?

Almost certainly. In parts of Los Angeles County roughly one in five drivers carries no insurance at all, and many of the rest carry only the statutory minimum. Because California UIM is offset against what the at-fault driver pays, carrying UM/UIM at exactly the state minimum leaves you with no effective underinsured protection. Raising those limits is inexpensive relative to what it protects.

Will California's minimum limits go up again?

Yes. SB 1107 built in a second increase. Effective January 1, 2035, the minimums rise to $50,000 per person, $100,000 per accident, and $25,000 for property damage.

How long do I have to file a car accident claim in California?

Generally two years from the date of injury under California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. Claims against a government entity — the City of Los Angeles, LA Metro, the County, or Caltrans — require a written claim within six months. These deadlines are strict, so speak with a lawyer early.

Does higher minimum coverage mean my premium went up?

If you previously carried only the state minimum, yes — most drivers at the bottom of the market saw an increase when their policy renewed in 2025. Drivers who already carried limits at or above 30/60/15 generally saw no change attributable to SB 1107.

Sources & further reading

Free, No-Obligation Case Review

Find out how much coverage is available for your claim

Tell us what happened. We'll review the police report, identify every applicable insurance policy, and tell you honestly what your claim is worth. No fee unless we win.

Prefer to talk now? Call (323) 372-1216. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.